Services

Manual testing services

We perform manual testing on more than 5000 real devices and cover a variety of platforms, operating systems, versions, manufacturers and configurations. Our team of ISTQB certified QA engineers have extensive experience in using industry-leading software testing tools and frameworks to ensure your product checks all the boxes.

Get in touch
QA engineer working on a manual testing project.

Join the group of Startups & Fortune 500 companies that care about quality.

  • Discord
  • Twilio
  • Microsoft
  • Zoom
  • Pinterest
When you may need it

Testing from a human perspective

Though there are a variety of test automation tools and frameworks available, not everything can and should be automated. Here are some instances when you may need manual testing services.

Manual mobile application testing in action.

Automated tests rely on pre-defined scenarios and only give “yes” or “no” answers. If you want to test a product from a human perspective, don’t have time for test automation, or need to perform UI/UX tests, manual testing is the smartest choice.

We can help

Find critical software bugs and defects

Are you looking for manual testing services? With more than a decade of experience, ISTQB certified quality assurance engineers, and over 5000 real devices, we can guarantee that your app will be in good hands.

Our services include:

  • Smoke testing
  • Exploratory testing
  • Usability testing
  • User acceptance testing
  • System testing
  • Regression testing
  • Integration testing
  • Test execution based on predefined use cases
Team of QA engineers working on their manual testing projects.
Manual testing service bug reporting process in action.
Outcomes

All the metrics you need in one place

Our engineers will provide you with a detailed manual testing report that will include all the metrics you need. We can either use available tools to create our own test report or use a tool or report template provided by you to create one.

FAQ

Most popular questions answered

While automated tests excel at repeating predefined steps, manual testing brings the human perspective into play. Not everything can be scripted – for example, checking the usability of a feature or observing an unexpected behavior requires human insight. Manual QA engineers can perform exploratory testing, trying out scenarios a script might not cover, and catch subtle issues (like a confusing UI flow or a minor glitch) that automation might miss. In short, manual testing is essential for discovering issues in areas like user experience, visual elements, and edge cases. It complements automation to ensure no bug slips through the cracks.
Manual testers can identify visual or UX problems – for instance, a button that's hard to click or a layout that looks wrong on a certain device – which an automated script wouldn't flag. They also notice error messages or warnings in context and can gauge whether the application is intuitive for real users. Moreover, during exploratory testing, human testers often stumble upon defects by using the app in unplanned ways (something users in the real world do!). Automation follows a script and might not catch surprises outside its script. So issues related to usability, inconsistent behavior, edge-case functional bugs, and any "oddities" in the app are usually caught via manual testing.
We take a thorough and organized approach to manual testing. First, our ISTQB-certified QA engineers design test cases covering all functional requirements and user scenarios. Then, testing is executed on a wide range of devices and platforms – we have 5000+ real devices, which means our testers can check your app on different phones, tablets, operating systems, and browsers. During testing, we simulate real user behavior, document every defect with steps and screenshots, and communicate issues promptly via detailed bug reports.
There are several situations where manual testing is preferable. In the early development stage, when the product is evolving rapidly, manual testing can adapt quickly to changes (automation requires the app to be relatively stable). If your product has a complex UI or many frequent changes, manual testers can more easily adjust and test new design tweaks or features on the fly. Manual testing is also better for usability testing and user acceptance testing, where understanding the user's experience is key.
We offer a full range of manual testing services to cover your needs. This includes smoke testing (quick checks of core features), regression testing (verifying that nothing broke after updates), and exploratory testing (unscripted, in-depth examinations to uncover hidden issues). We also conduct usability testing and UX reviews to assess the user-friendliness of the application. Additionally, our team can handle user acceptance testing (UAT) support, acting as an independent testing group to validate the product against requirements.
Ready to get started?

Test your solution better. Faster. Together.

Test your solution faster and more thoroughly by working with quality assurance experts who will help you develop a testing solution tailored to your needs.

Contact us